<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Revish reviews: 'evolution'</title>
        <link>http://www.revish.com</link>
        <description>Revish reviews tagged with 'evolution'</description>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <generator>Revish.com</generator>
        
        <language>en</language>
        <webMaster>team@revish.com</webMaster>
        <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Book reviews</category>
        <ttl>60</ttl>
        <item>
            <title>A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson</title>
            <link>http://www.revish.com/reviews/096573840X/omniba/</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Find out how you got here, and where "here" is....</p><p>Without a doubt this is the best, easiest, most informative book I have ever read. From the first whisper of something out there in the big black nothing, to the big bang, to gasses, to their expansion, to their solidification, to the atom, to the lava, to the water, and to the things that crawled out of it - on and on: the history of the universe, everything in it, of it, right through to you and me, and to the  billions and trillions of tiny little bits and pieces that make us up and keep us on the go.</p>
<p>Bill Bryson writes in such an illustrative way that one gets the feeling of having understood, at long last, what is going on around us and how it actually works.  </p>
<p>Brim-full with anecdotes not only about everything from molecules to mountains but also about the evidence-finding, the difficulties of research, the back-biting and the rivalry of the researchers, and the casual stumbling upon immense truths that have changed entire concepts within physics and the history of evolution.  And everything written in language which is accessible, totally devoid of pomposity – destined to be understood by everyone, even by those who still shudder at the idea of yet another lesson in the lab.</p>
<p>The beautiful thing is that Bryson doesn’t take or aim to take the wonder out of everything – he just lets his reader fully appreciate just how awe-inspiring – and even how extraordinary in the fullest sense of the word – everything is.</p>
<p>This is a book which can be read beginning to end, can be dipped into for a quick pick-me-up for the brain, and can then be re-read again and again with non-diminished pleasure.  </p>
<p>If you want to know how important you are and how lucky it is that you ever got here, this is a must read of the first order.  You cannot do without. </p>

]]></description>
            <author>team@revish.com (omniba)</author>
            <comments>http://www.revish.com/reviews/096573840X/omniba/#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.revish.com/reviews/096573840X/omniba/</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief by Francis S. Collins</title>
            <link>http://www.revish.com/reviews/1416542744/MauriceAWilliams/</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Deciphering God's Instruction Book</p><p>The recent decoding of the human genome surprised many in the scientific community that something so huge and so complex has finally been unraveled.  The human genome, the DNA coding for every hereditary trait that influences the development of any individual, is carried in every living cell of the human body.  If it were printed in English, it would consist of three billion characters.  A printed English version would make a book as thick as the Washington monument is tall.  Cracking the human genome paves the way for scientists to identify genes that cause hereditary defects and makes possible a cure for these defects.</p>

<p>Francis S. Collins started his education as an agnostic.  During graduate study, when he was twenty-one, he became an atheist.  When he was twenty-six, someone caused him to reexamine his beliefs.  His was a challenging journey, being a well-informed scientist considering the presence of God when many scientists are convinced that there is no God.  Collins gradually became convinced that God does exist.  The complexity of the human genome helped him realize that something so complex and so effective in determining the human bodily and physical abilities as well as the bodies and instincts of every living creature simply cannot be the product of pure chance.  It’s a glimpse of the God that cannot be seen creating the physical universe that can be seen.  We see the physical result only after God has created it.</p>

<p>Collins described his journey to faith by explaining the human genome.  Then he reviews current scientific theories explaining the origin of the universe and the solar system.  He shows that these theories are not inconsistent with what is revealed in Scripture.  He cites polarization of both religious apologists and scientists and argues that the conflict between religion and science stems more from misstatements from both sides than it does from any true conflict between the two fields of study.  He quotes St. Augustine’s warning: “In matters that are so obscure and far beyond our vision, we find in Holy Scripture passages which can be interpreted in very different ways without prejudice to the faith we have received.  In such cases, we should not rush in headlong and so firmly take our stand on one side that, if further progress in the search for truth justly undermines this position, we too fall with it.”</p>

<p>Collins finishes his book with a cogent discussion of bioethics that will give the reader much food for thought.  “The Language of God” is a well-written, very informative book that shows that there is no real contradiction between the discoveries of science and the existence of God.</p>


<p>Maurice A. Williams</p>]]></description>
            <author>team@revish.com (Maurice A. Williams)</author>
            <comments>http://www.revish.com/reviews/1416542744/MauriceAWilliams/#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.revish.com/reviews/1416542744/MauriceAWilliams/</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Upright Ape: A New Origin of the Species by Aaron G. Filler</title>
            <link>http://www.revish.com/reviews/1564149331/MauriceAWilliams/</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>A new twist to an old theory</p><p>I picked up this book with great interest.  I remember, twenty years ago, reading “The Naked Ape” by Desmond Morris and “The Territorial Imperative” by Konrad Lorenx.  Both books were well written and made a profound impact on my view of human nature.  Will “The Upright Ape” make a similar impact?</p>

<p>The author, Dr. Aaron G. Filler certainly has the qualifications to write on this subject.   He is highly qualified in both anthropology and in medicine, earning his MA in anthropology in 1979, his MD degree in 1986 and also his PhD in 1986.   Besides his training in anthropology and evolutionary theory, he is also a world famous neurosurgeon for his skill treating spinal disorders.  As an expert in both fields, he has much insight into what kind of spinal structure is needed to support upright verses horizontal posture.  Through the years, he has advised some of his fellow anthropologists by examining their fossil finds and their professional papers.</p>

<p>The stimulus for his book and his choice of title “The Upright Ape” began in 1981 when a fellow anthropologist placed in his hands a seemingly inexplicable twenty-one-million-year-old fossil.  “The bone had the totally unique features found in humans, but it was from a creature that lived fifteen million years too soon.”  After studying this fossil, Filler believed that it can be explained, but Darwin’s Theory, as it presently stood, could not explain it.  Filler realized that a broader, more general theory of evolution would be required, one that incorporates the phenomenal growth of scientific knowledge gained over the past twenty-five years.</p>

<p>The fossil given him had its origin in a volcanic region along the Uganda-Kenya border that was studded with numerous twenty-two-million-year-old mammalian fossils from the Miocene era.  The most surprising fossil was a nearly complete mid lumbar vertebra that was assigned to the species Proconsul Major.   I think this is the fossil Filler examined in 1981.  Based on his expertise in medicine as well as anthropology, especially his skill in spinal disorders, Filler claims this fossil is the defining proof of a revolutionary new idea.  It is proof that the common ancestor of humans and apes probably already had an upright stance, bipedal locomotion, and did not require the use of arms and hands for locomotion.</p>

<p>Filler felt that this was an entirely new genus among the hominoids—basically, an entirely new kind of animal.  It was a primate that not only stood erect, but could not walk comfortably in a horizontal position as modern apes do.  This revolutionary discovery is the core of Filler’s book.  Modern apes evolving from an upright ancestor is not the general consensus of Darwinian Theory, so, based on many new discoveries, Filler felt some updating of the theory is warranted.  Sections of his book trace the development of scientific understanding of how new species of animals have changed through time, starting before Darwin’s General Theory of Evolution and continuing to the present.  I didn’t know the German poet Goethe was one of the pioneers in this field.  Filler provides an interesting history of how the Theory of Evolution was developed and why it is widely accepted by scientists today.  He tried not to get too technical.  “I propose to make my case by proceeding simultaneously in both the formal academic arena and in the broader sphere of access provided by a book written for the general public.”  He succeeds to some extent, but the book is still pretty technical.</p>

<p>Anthropologists who study Australopithecus and Homo are convinced that upright bipedalism must have arisen from a quadruple common ancestor with a chimpanzee.  However, there is no definitive fossil evidence at all for this position.  All the evidence, which Filler reviews in detail in his book, actually points the other way when it is fully and fairly considered.  There are presently four great hominoids on our planet: Orangutan, Chimpanzee, Gorilla, and humans.   Only humans have an upright posture.  Filler argues that both Sahelanthropus and Orrorin fit the description of being human; both may be reasonable candidates for ancestry of the chimpanzee lineage as well.  He goes on to say that if this evidence for an upright bipedal, hominiform lineage is accepted, then either of the two above species can be seen as a human ancestor for the chimpanzee, which would turn Darwin’s theory upside down.</p>

<p>I think Dr. Filler has marred what might have been a very good book on science by crossing over into religion and theology and trying to refute the beliefs of Christianity.  He is not an expert in these fields.  I think he should have let his sound scientific findings stand on their own merits and state his thoughts about religion in a separate book.  In spite of that, however, if you are interested in cutting edge discoveries in anthropology and in a proposed updating of the theory of evolution that accounts for new discoveries, you will find this book very interesting.</p>]]></description>
            <author>team@revish.com (Maurice A. Williams)</author>
            <comments>http://www.revish.com/reviews/1564149331/MauriceAWilliams/#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 08:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.revish.com/reviews/1564149331/MauriceAWilliams/</guid>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
